Dear City of
Tuscaloosa: Why Am I Paying Someone Else’s Bill?
The actress Mary
Astor said, “Once you start asking questions, innocence is gone.” After
recently daring to question local politics I have decided that this observation
has merit. The question that robbed me of my political naïveté’ so to speak was
“why?” I wanted an opportunity to ask Mayor Walt Maddox this most basic of
questions and receive answers in response; to, if I may be so bold, engage in a
dialogue.
Much like the
great and powerful Oz, Mayor Maddox is difficult to reach. Gone with our former
mayor, the beloved Al Dupont, are the days of the open door policy at city
hall. While Mayor Maddox doesn’t hide behind a curtain pulling levers, he is carefully situated
behind multiple locked doors, each requiring security badge clearance for admission and further buffered by a wall of security guards. To my knowledge, Nick Saban,
one of the most sought after men in Tuscaloosa travels with no security guards- yet our mayor’s comings and goings about town are treated like those of POTUS.
The closest thing to one-on-one access with Mayor Maddox is via Facebook,
Twitter and Instagram. I grew frustrated that the only access I had to
information, other than social media, was one-sided statements and video sound
bites he would release from behind the castle walls. Desperate for real
information I went so far as to spend two days of my life exploring his most
recently advertised creation which I like to call the portal of transparency. (I
used the word “transparency” because if I had a nickel for every time he has
dropped the word I would be sitting on a beach somewhere instead of blogging to
you.) While I enjoyed the colorful bar graphs and pie charts in the end I found
the portal to be a big old gateway to nothing. The electronic equivalent of
word vomit it makes lots of noise but provides no real information. Council
meetings are likewise ineffective. You are allowed a brief time at the podium, carefully
monitored by a large video stopwatch projected onto the wall, during which time
you may express your opinion on a matter. There is no question and answer
portion and certainly no debating positions.
But, I suppose my
breaking point came when I viewed a tweet of a “mayor’s night out” event which
was represented as an opportunity for his constituents to meet the mayor and
discuss issues. There was a photograph taken at a local brewery as the mayor
played some sort of video game…Mario Cart I think. And so I asked the mayor,
via Twitter, when would he hold a substantive question and answer session for
citizens to attend. In reply, he insisted that craft beer and video games was
in fact the citizens’ opportunity to talk to their mayor. Ignoring the
ridiculousness of that statement, I again asked when, if ever, he might hold a
real forum. This prompted him to invite me to schedule a private meeting at his
office. I want to know why we are still refusing to charge impact fees on new
developments. That decision impacted all of Tuscaloosa, so shouldn’t the rest
of the gang have an opportunity to weigh in? It was soon thereafter that the
mayor blocked me from all of his social media accounts. Now I don’t consider
myself a sensitive person but I’m not sure how I feel about being blocked by an
elected official. Was it something I said? Perhaps it was something he didn’t
want to say.
I have researched
the limited information available regarding the death of impact fees which I
will share with you now. Any omissions were an oversight. Perhaps you, my
friends and neighbors, will have an answer for me….I hope so.
In May 2011, the Tuscaloosa
Forward Task Force was created by executive order of Mayor Maddox and citizens
throughout the community were appointed to serve. The goal was for Tuscaloosa
to re-build better and stronger than it had been. We all drank the Kool-Aid so
to speak and believed that everyone wanted to do what was best for Tuscaloosa.
In July 2013,
Mayor Maddox issued an executive order creating the “Student Rental Housing
Task Force” who in turn worked tirelessly and in October 2013, presented a
comprehensive report to the mayor and city council regarding the rebuilding of
student housing after April 27, 2011.
In November 2013, The
Tuscaloosa News reported that the Student Rental Housing Task Force’s nine
preliminary recommendations were discussed by the mayor and city council. One
of the recommendations presented in that report was that the city review the
utilization of impact fees to offset the related costs of upgrades, ongoing
maintenance and improvements to the infrastructure system. Impact fees are
utilized by local governments to assist in the funding of infrastructure or
public services on new developments. These fees are designed to offset the
demand new developments place on the existing infrastructure. Impact fees are
not a new concept. One study estimates that approximately 60% of all cities
with over 25,000 residents along with 40% of metropolitan counties use these
sorts of impact fees on new developments. This recommendation was not
addressed.
On February 5, 2015,
at the request of Mayor Maddox, the Student Rental Housing Task Force was
re-convened to review its prior recommendations. The task force stood behind its
recommendations but took this opportunity to again encourage that the
possibility of impact fees be addressed sooner rather than later.
But an olive
branch of sorts was extended by the city when in April 2015 they voted to
abolish their policy of reimbursing the water line extension costs for new
developments within the city limits. If you have ever had a discussion with the
City of Tuscaloosa on how, per their calculations, a water line located on
their side of a property line is your responsibility to repair, you are
probably shaking your head at this bombshell. Let it sink in for a moment, we,
the taxpayers, were paying the costs associated with new developments water
lines. The removal of this little perk was represented, at least by The
Tuscaloosa News on June 12, 2015, as the city’s first step in adopting impact
fees. I must respectfully disagree. No longer requiring your taxpayers to foot
the bill for new developments is not imposing an impact fee on the developer
for the strain the new development has placed on public utilities, it is simply
placing a cost where it belonged in the first place.
The mayor, who has
remained opposed to impact fees said, “I’ve been very reluctant on this issue.
I want to make sure that whatever we’re doing, we’re not taxing the tax. I
think slower is better, and I will
certainly bend to the will of the council.” (Emphasis added.) His opinion
was supported by Jim Page, CEO of The West Alabama Chamber of Commerce. There
has been a great deal of attention paid to the influence the chamber seems to
hold with the mayor which came to light when the city was working on revising
its MX zoning ordinances. It appears that the mayor created yet another task
force, this one called The Chamber of Commerce of West Alabama’s Business
Recovery Task Force, which met privately with the mayor and made
recommendations that were not released to the public. But that task force is information for another
day.
The Tuscaloosa
City Council’s Administration and Policy Committee paid water and wastewater
consulting firm Raftelis Financial $49,500.00 to help develop impact fee
structures for new developments in Tuscaloosa. Raftelis project manager Tony
Hairston estimated that the city’s then current rate of development could yield
an additional 1 million dollars per year in impact fees. Impact fees for growth
that has legitimately impacted the community that we, the taxpayers, wouldn’t
have to foot the bill for.
By March 1, 2016,
The Tuscaloosa News reported that instead of following through with impact fees
that Tuscaloosa had instead opted to be the largest city in Alabama without
them. Jimmy Junkin, then director of the Water and Sewer Board gave a short
presentation to the council prior to their vote and said, “Current funding for
growth-related capital projects is very limited. We’re really strapped.”
Credited heavily with the council’s decision was the strong position of the
mayor that the Student Housing Rental Task Force had only recommended impact
fees on mega-complexes not impact fees on all new developments as the council
was now proposing. “I believe that, quite frankly, this is nothing more than a
back door tax” said the mayor. And per the article, “His opinion led the
council’s public projects committee to let the proposed adoption of impact fees
die for lack of action.”
So where does that
leave us? In April 2015 the mayor said he would bend to the will of the council
in regards to impact fees yet by March 2016 he shut down not only the of impact
fees on mega-complexes but impact fees on any new developments. On March
6, 2016, WBRC quoted Mayor Maddox as saying that the city is, “well-positioned”
to handle future infrastructure needs, citing $250 million in local
infrastructure projects planned for Tuscaloosa over the next decade. I guess
Mr. Junkin missed that memo.
On January 25,
2017, The Tuscaloosa News brought us news of one of many recent infrastructure
breakdowns and proof, in my opinion, that karma indeed exists. Not surprisingly
there was no press release from the mayor regarding the massive sinkhole that
opened up near The Hilliard Fletcher Wastewater Treatment Plant but there was a
great quote from a civil engineer for the city who appropriately recognized,
“We’ve got a problem.” Well said sir. A 60-inch sewer line failed, creating a
sinkhole large enough to house four sport utility vehicles. That definitely
qualifies as a problem. But fear not citizens, the two contracts necessary for
repair will only cost $800,000.00 and per the news “Each contract is a
not-to-exceed amount, meaning likely taxpayers won’t be on the hook for more.”
Well that’s a relief! City officials voted to shift the funds out of the Water
and Sewer Fund’s Reserve for Future Improvement….I guess that means we are a
little less “well-equipped” to handle future infrastructure needs? I for one
think that $1 million dollars per year in impact fees would have come in handy
during this little catastrophe but as you might imagine….the mayor could not be
reached for comment.
COMING SOON…..MEGA-APARTMENT COMPLEXES